RE: Ethics of Fashion
August 6, 2022 at 8:14 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2022 at 8:28 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(August 6, 2022 at 7:30 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:1. Donation can be an exchange of goods what do think buying girl scout cookies is? But your wrong anyway as funding is any form of infusing money into an organization. So this objection doesn't work.(August 6, 2022 at 6:47 pm)Helios Wrote: Funding exploitation makes you part of the exploitation. It's not that complicated.....
Terms like funding, supporting, and sponsoring all imply that the transaction functions more like a donation in which there isn't an exchange of goods.
If I purchase an apple from you for $10, am I ethically responsible for the pack of cigarettes you subsequently bought with that money?
2. This analogy doesn't work either so let's fix it. If you bought an apple from me and I run orchards that essentially run on slave labor and I'm being enriched by the money from your purchase then you indeed have a hand in the exploitation. No customers No money No business No slave laborers. Again it's not complicated....
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
