Let's put another analogy on the table. You're a U.S. senator and you're tasked with voting on a bill that contains some good things and some bad things. If you vote yes because of the good things, are you ethically obligated to take responsibility for the bad things. If you vote no, are you unethically denying your constituents things that are in their interest in the good parts of the bill. Can purchases not be similar, a mixed bag in which you're only signing on to responsibility for the good that results?
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)