(November 30, 2011 at 4:47 pm)Tiberius Wrote: There was nothing smug about what I wrote. I honestly thought you were being a man and owning up to some of the blame. Now I understand that you were simply saying whatever you thought would get me to drop the subject. I find this behaviour repulsive.
People apologise because they have something to apologise for; they have something to feel sorry about, and want to rectify it. People apologise because it is the right thing to do. People who apologise just to "stop the fucking arguing" aren't doing it right.
You can drop it if you want; I've done nothing wrong towards you that merits an apology; all of my wrongs were aimed at bozo, and I've apologised for them. I'm not going to drop it; as far as I'm concerned, you wronged me, and then when I finally got an apology and said it was "gracious" of you, you turned around and explained how it wasn't an apology after all.
Now you question my manhood right after saying that you werent smug?
Your response to my apology was smug. Just like your apology to him was forced. If it wasnt forced I honestly believe you would not have done so...and in no way would I question your man hood about such a thing regardless.
And I DID mean that I might have been wrong in reading your posts, but your smugness has made me think otherwise.
Then i turned around and SHOWED you the definition of apology and that I DID apologize according to it...and then I offered up a way for us all to get out of the argument by admitting I may have been wrong...your smugness ruined that and yet we are STILL arguing over it.
I am no longer responding to this part of the thread.
