(September 10, 2022 at 4:35 pm)Angrboda Wrote:(September 10, 2022 at 4:15 pm)MilesAbbott81 Wrote: You seem determined to shove some kind of logical fallacy down my throat, when you barely addressed my long and carefully constructed original post. And frankly, saying "you were never a true Christian" isn't an excuse. It's an explanation. An excuse infers that there is some fault on behalf of the philosophy, when I have conceded no fault at all.
Anytime beliefs or claims are involved, there is a need for defending them, whether with reason or excuses. You've not provided any actual reason why atheism, science, or philosophy can justifiably be considered any different. Thus I stand by my characterization of your response as an example of the ad hoc fallacy and you've done nothing but provide a continuing stream of ad hoc non sequiturs to disguise the fallacious nature of your response.
As to my barely addressing your long and carefully constructed original post, you made it clear that only the last part of that was addressed to atheists such as myself and so complaining that I didn't address a set of points which you didn't intend for me to respond to simply marks you for the asshole that you are.
Again, you're speaking too vaguely for me to understand your meaning clearly.
And actually, you're wrong about my original post. All of that material that you responded to was not intended for atheists, which should have been clear from the context.
The only part explicitly intended for the atheist was about wicked people speaking evil of the Lord on here and thinking they can just get away with it (to be fair, it was also intended for the false Christians on here). None of you have in the past, neither will any of you in the future.
