RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
December 3, 2011 at 12:41 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2011 at 12:44 pm by LastPoet.)
I can, because there are much more credible explanations to our existence than your god lucent.
Lol, are you reading the same article? You have a serious reading comprehension problem, you know?
"lucen Wrote:That is *not* what gnosticism is. You don't get to make up definitions for what gnosticism means simply because it appears to be an opposite to agnositicm. Gnosticism is in fact Christian mysticism and has nothing to do with knowledge about whether God can be known.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism
Lol, are you reading the same article? You have a serious reading comprehension problem, you know?
"lucen Wrote:This idea you have about "gnostic" and "agnostic" atheists is logically incoherent If you reject the idea that you can know God exists, then you also reject the idea that you can know if he doesn't exist. You cannot therefore also believe He doesn't exist.You truly are a confused sod, like I said before belief in god or disbelief isn't a dichothomy, you can believe many things besides god, numbnuts. Knowledge, i.e. either you know or don't know, its a dichotomy, unless your unfamiliar with P^~P=false, if so, Ill give you a beating, so you know the difference between being in pain and not in pain. You mabe had a point, if the only Pssible belief for our existence is your god, yet you fail, and fail badly to understand this.