RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
December 3, 2011 at 1:13 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2011 at 1:24 pm by Ace Otana.)
He cannot win this debate. Many have tried to redefine atheism and failed. He is like all the others. A broken record that will only repeat itself and never listen.
He's not very bright.
He's not very bright.
Quote: "no position is more continuously misrepresented than atheism. Atheism is without God. It does not assert no God."
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
