RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
December 3, 2011 at 2:30 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2011 at 2:40 pm by lucent.)
(December 3, 2011 at 2:05 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: I challenge Lucent to a formal debate in the debate forum
http://atheistforums.org/forum-23.html
I challenge him to an exercise of the mind during this debate. I challenge him to defend the atheist position, while I, an atheist, defend a specific theistic position. Me and Lucent only, with a moderator of Lucents choosing to help keep us on topic and in-line.
Also, to be even more fair, I would suggest to Lucent (this is merely a suggestion) that, if he is willing, that a good choice would be Tack-attack for the mod, as he is a fellow theist.
What say you?
Alright, I accept your challenge. Let's do it in standard debate format with four rounds..opening, 2 rebuttals, and closing. Tack is fine for mod, but I'm fine with whomever. What theistic position are you going to be defending?
(December 3, 2011 at 2:27 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: ...for me in the debate...I will be defending Asatru
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PozbCdtvi...re=related
Asatru? I don't know if that is going to be very fruitful. You might as well be arguing for the FSM. If I am going to have to argue as an atheist, I think you should have to argue as a serious theist and not from obscure pagan belief.
