RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
December 3, 2011 at 4:37 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2011 at 4:50 pm by Ace Otana.)
Already have lucent. Time and time again. The debate is over. I've seen enough and now I'm adding you to ignore to finish it. Take the fucking hint.
Grow up.
What I hate most about some theists is that they talk and act as if they rule the fucking universe.
As if they can just redefine things at will. And to assert that only god is the plausible of all things. I guess ignoring them is the best way to deal with them. Give'em no attention. Those who talk bollocks shall have a very empty hall.
Grow up.
What I hate most about some theists is that they talk and act as if they rule the fucking universe.
As if they can just redefine things at will. And to assert that only god is the plausible of all things. I guess ignoring them is the best way to deal with them. Give'em no attention. Those who talk bollocks shall have a very empty hall.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
