Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

[lucent]

What's most telling about you is that you approved of this post which said I should go kill myself:

"Tape a bag of porridge to your face, suffocate yourself, and rid humanity of your poisonous and perverted 'understanding' of the endeavour we are currently taking to comprehend the cosmos for all I care:" - Welsh Cake, using classic atheist argumentation

Haha, you were waiting to launch a strawman didn't you? You are equating welsh cake's opinion to mine and all the other atheists. Good for you, but you seriously lack reading comprehension. I'm not as harsh as Welsh cake, but what I do wish is that you with those idiot beliefs, dishonesty and downright lies, dont procreate. Not because of you, but because of the poor children that would have you as a father.

I'm still waiting for your proof that your sky-daddy exists, that classic diversion maneuvre won't get you anywhere.

You approved of his post, therefore you approve of the content of the post. I am not applying this to all atheists, I am applying it to you:

"Kudos given by (1): LastPoet"

Now, not only have you unapologetically approved of someone advising me to kill myself, on top of that you also try to heap more insult upon me by also saying I shouldn't have children. I think that this indicates whom, between the two of us, is less qualified to be a parent.

---

The question is "does God exist?", not "which God is He?". The new atheists wish to redefine the definition of atheism to make atheism the default position and not have to justify their position. That is the difference in argumentation.

Well that is complete bullshit for a start. Not all atheists think that way - I'm as hardcore atheist as they come and I ague that atheism isn't the default position but nothingness is. Only when you add theism, does atheism become anything at all.

So you're a nihilist?