(December 3, 2011 at 11:55 am)Epimethean Wrote:(November 29, 2011 at 3:34 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: Does anyone know what the fallacy of presenting the phenomena/place in question as "ontological proof" of any given supernatural being's existence is?
Like for example: "The Universe is proof of a God."
"The Forest is proof of Unicorns"
And so on...
Isn't that the argument from ignorance?
Nope, argument from ignorance is "you can't prove It's false, thus its true" or "you can't prove it's true, thus it's false"