(December 14, 2022 at 9:13 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:(December 14, 2022 at 5:54 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Simply because a State exists doesn’t make it tyrannical [note correct spelling]. But I’m glad you agree with me that anarcho-capitalism simply replaces a public State with a private one.
Boru
Like I've said, each of those steps of how a private state would form seems problematic. Why would crime rise to the point that everybody being armed does not control it? Would people really think security companies are the answer? Would security companies really form a monopoly (rather than working against each other, like NSA and TOR Project)?
Crime wouldn’t rise to that level, and everybody being armed does not control crime (it exacerbates it).
Here are some more problems for you to ignore:
-How is everybody going to be armed?
-Who is going to arm them?
-Who does ‘everybody’ include?
-Anarcho-capitalism is all about property right. Could someone use violence to defend themselves against a non-property crime?
-Who, in your stateless society, is going to punish people who commit crimes? Who will have the authority to fine or imprison them?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
