(December 7, 2011 at 3:37 pm)Ace Otana Wrote:Quote:None of these ridiculous examples account for any unexplained occurrences and all are known to be products of the imagination.Perfect description of the god concept. Ridiculous and can't account for any unexplained occurrences and are products of imagination.
This is the perfect description from your biased perspective. As you cannot provide any valid alterative to account for existence the god concept is still on the table. You’ve gone one step too far with Ockham’s razor and eliminate causality due to what you believe. It doesn’t make sense to dismiss cause and effect but you’ve done so.
Quote:Now seeing as the FSM, the celestial teapot and pixies are so ridiculous, you should have no problems disproving them.
Tell me what they explain or why there is a requirement for them? The only similarity is you cannot provide an alternative for a god or a teapot, what this proves will remain a mystery in your own mind.