Women's Rights

[Thumpalumpacus]

You created a strawman and then criticize then argue against your own strawman,  who the dummy?

All I did was point out the ineluctable logic of your position, and, by the way, use your own words against you ("so yeah, I think it [the ability to give birth] is the number one defining characteristic of a woman.")

Those are your own words, Huggy. It's a shame you don't have the integrity to own your views and the implications they carry, but it's hardly surprising, to me.

What I actually said was that women that can't have children are still women for the simple fact that we acknowledge that is an exception, not the rule, trans women aren't in that same category.

You still don't understand that I'm not arguing the status of trans women, but pointing out your obvious chauvinism. This inability to understand what has already been told to you is why I made mention of your dimness.

 

YOU brought up menopause which speaks to BIOLOGY fool and isn't even an exception.

I did indeed bring it up. I don't know why you think only you should be able to add to the conversation, but you really should get over yourself. Such an overweening ego as yours surely cannot please the Christ you claim to worship and emulate.

How can something that biological women experience natural make them less of a woman? Trans women do not experience menopause (again, YOUR OWN ARGUMENT) making them NOT THE SAME.

Once again, that whoooooosh ....

I thought you turned over a new leaf Thumpalumpacus, but it seems you're still the clown you always were,  don't make me have to go post up some of your old arguments in the hall of shame.

Ooooh, Huggy's threatening to go to his spank-bank and masturbate over his perceived or proclaimed victories. Whatever shall I do?!

Also, if you're going to call someone a "dummy", it behooves you to make sure your English is less sloppy than this and previous examples present.