@FlatAssembler
1. Real-world experience demonstrates that gun control laws reduce the incidence of gun violence. When the US banned assault-type weapons, mass shootings dropped like a paralyzed falcon. When the ban expired, mass shootings increased. But it’s not just mass shootings: wherever and whenever access to firearms is restricted, gun violence of ALL types decreases. This is an observed fact, no subject to rational debate. No study needed.
2. Violent crime isn’t the same as gun crime.
3. This rubbish about ‘gun free zones’ is a red herring. A gun-free zone has bugger all to do with restrictions on gun ownership.
4. Again, I’m not going to re-chew Kleck’s study. All the points that need to have been made about it have already been made.
5. I am sick to death hearing about your linguistic studies.
6. Of COURSE having a mental illness is a good predictor of being a mass shooter. How can you sensibly argue that mass shooters are mentally healthy?
Boru
1. Real-world experience demonstrates that gun control laws reduce the incidence of gun violence. When the US banned assault-type weapons, mass shootings dropped like a paralyzed falcon. When the ban expired, mass shootings increased. But it’s not just mass shootings: wherever and whenever access to firearms is restricted, gun violence of ALL types decreases. This is an observed fact, no subject to rational debate. No study needed.
2. Violent crime isn’t the same as gun crime.
3. This rubbish about ‘gun free zones’ is a red herring. A gun-free zone has bugger all to do with restrictions on gun ownership.
4. Again, I’m not going to re-chew Kleck’s study. All the points that need to have been made about it have already been made.
5. I am sick to death hearing about your linguistic studies.
6. Of COURSE having a mental illness is a good predictor of being a mass shooter. How can you sensibly argue that mass shooters are mentally healthy?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
