Killing through drink-driving is indirect. My point was that nobody is harmed simply from a person drinking (i.e. the action of tipping the beverage down your throat), whereas people are harmed from second-hand smoke.
I agree with you on the campaigns thing. Promoting the dangers of smoking should be the aim of the campaign, not to smear the people who decide to endanger their lives; that is their liberty.
I agree with you on the campaigns thing. Promoting the dangers of smoking should be the aim of the campaign, not to smear the people who decide to endanger their lives; that is their liberty.