(July 15, 2023 at 4:04 pm)GrandizerII Wrote:I think that one swirls around gods commonly having the same functions, regardless of where or when they come from or what theyre called. A functional explanation of cultural similarity isn't useful to nuts, so they go a different way with it - but that statement incriminates the larger belief system on it's own.(July 12, 2023 at 9:58 pm)Sicnoo0 Wrote: The very same "gods" were described across multiple cultures all over the planet. You can find endless examples of gods that went by one name in one culture and by another name (in some cases an extremely similar name) in another culture.
I feel like there might be some exaggerating going on here. Sure, we have scenarios in which one culture borrows/adapts gods and other mythical figures from another culture (for example, the ancient Romans borrowing/adapting gods from the ancient Greeks), but these cases are plausible because of the temporal/geographic proximity between both cultures. However, your first statement here makes it sound like so many cultures (including cultures that were otherwise temporally and geographically distant from one another) shared all the same gods, and that's just not really true.
Quote:I can save you the trouble. They exist, and are the later versions of already ancient fairy tales which started out with the gods palaces being drawn by teams of animals, ofc. It's interesting from the point of view of linguistics and anthropology, but nothing about it that;s interesting points to spaceships.Quote:The flying machines that Hindu deities were said to have had are what really gets me. Sounds just like the UAPs we're seeing in recent years. The machines were described as being able to move in any direction while still facing in the same direction, like a helicopter. This is exactly like the UAPs that get described nowadays
In order for me to make a fair response here, I need to first see those verses that talk of these flying machines. If you've already posed examples in later posts, I'll have a look now. Otherwise, please post these verses here so we can all have a look and see for ourselves what is a reasonable conclusion to make in light of all these verses and other supposed pieces of evidence. Doing so might also serve to help you reassess the credibility of your own position even.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
