(July 24, 2023 at 2:41 pm)Loaded dice Wrote:(July 24, 2023 at 2:30 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: It is a mostly accurate assessment, but because it is accurate and unanswerable you would like to pretend someone had somehow put it behind YOU, so YOU can avoid answering and unanswerable by calling it out of date.
It is mostly accurate because orthodox religious beliefs are not entirely psychopathic, because in All probability only some of its movers and shakers were truly psychopaths. The rest were sociopaths. The difference is one derives destructive psychological pathology from congenital flaw, given by god in words you can relate to, the other is given by society and upbringing.
Um.. what are your qualifications in psychology? If you don't have any, get out of here and stop telling us that people babbling about psychopathy is an unanswerable argument.
Linking religion to psychopathy is hate speech, an easy way out for anti-religion people to avoid assessing religious claims and arguments.
The fastest and most dishonest way to dismiss someone's argument is to call them crazy. It did happen a lot in human history, including to scientists.
No, your religion is hate speech. The most dishonest way to advocate for a religion is to speak of your gut instinct as if you are of some value so your guts have some value. Psychopathy is not crazy, nor is sociopathy. It is just tend to be disproportionately destructive on individual basis and on collective basis.
