RE: Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance.
July 26, 2023 at 6:09 am
Quote:My terminology is correct. Evolutionists sometimes refer to Abiogenesis as Chemical Evolution, see this for e.g.: "Chemical evolution may refer to: Abiogenesis, the transition from nonliving elements to living systems" Hence, I mentioned it in the OP Thread Title after reading their writings and put it in "quotes" to indicate that was how they called it.Which is totally distinct from the theory of evolution and there is no such thing as an Evolutionists that's a made-up creationist term
Quote:We also should distinguish Particles-to-People Evolution from mutations within species.There is no "Particles-to-People Evolution" those are distinct and separate theories and evolution within species and between species is more than demonstrated
Quote:Even Apes-to-Men evolution is not proven just by the fact that apes develop certain mutations in time.There is no Ape to Men evolution because Men are apes and yes that does prove it beyond reasonable doubt.
Quote:Brian, ok, will peruse your links and get back in timeAnd all you will do is make excuses for the liars
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM