that's a good point, but the fact of the matter is, science is what's proving what is in the physical world. since god is outside that, there is no way to scientifically prove that it doesn't exist, all you can do is look at the design of how living things work and they're so complicated we don't fully understand them. the big question is, how can things so complicated just occure in nature with no guidence from a designer when we can't even reproduce them with guidence? it's not just unlikely, it's insane. and if in fact these things couldn't just happen in nature and they had to built by someone the question then is who? well it would have to be something outside this universe sense everything in the universe has a beginning and an end which refers us to the theory of an inteligent designer outside our universe. that's how it can be proven right and try to refute this point without personal insults and i will agnolage all valid points.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 18, 2025, 11:31 am
Thread Rating:
Arguments for God Fail Specific Religions
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)