"Nothing suggests that god created anything. You haven't demonstrated that a god exists yet. A does not prove B without first proving A."
good point, but lets talk about how this applies to evelution. in order for evelution to work they must prove the earth is millions of years old. how do they do this? using various dating methods. though there have been many cases that have proven them to be inaccurate. here's one example: samples were taken from a lava dome on mt st helens and radio dated them using potassium-argon in 1986. they got ages of 340,000 to 2.8 million years old on rocks only 10 years old. what's their explination? this is it "considerins that the half-life of potassium-40 is fairly long (1,250 million years) the potassium-argon method cannot be used to date samples that are much younger than 6,000 years old. a few thousand years are not enough time for argon 40 to accumulate in a sample at high enough concentrations to be dectected and quantified." what does that mean? well lets play the what if game. what if the earth was around 6,000 years old? well then this method wouldn't be accurate on any rock that exists according to their own description. well what about carbon dating? well that is used on organic substances, not rocks, and is not accurate after 50,000 years because unlike potassium 40, carbon 14 has a much lower half-life and after 50,000 years, all the carbon 14 in a substance would be gone, decayed into nitrogen. therefore, cannot possibly give the dates necessary for evolution. it's bad science.
"Your god doesn't seem complicated at all. It's an excuse for ignorance."
oh he doesn't? ok maybe you can explain how God can be 3 people but one person at the same time, how a part of him can know something the other does not cuz not even i understand that and it's my religion not your's. you don't even care therefore you never thought about it so of course he seams simple it's a possibility we can overlook cuz it's stupid.
apparently those of you don't know what science is. this is how it works, you come up with a hypothesis, then you do an experiment to prove it wrong, or possibly right. if the experiment doesn't work, it's wrong. if it does work it could be right, but you could later disprove it with another experiment so we can only go so far when proving something right. evelution, however, cannot be experimented because we don't have millions of years to observe these things and we don't exactly understand how life started in the first place. it's an incomplete theory and no one can deny that. but this theory can't even get close to be proven b/c it can't even make it past the guessing stage. therefore evolution isn't science at all, it's just a guess that some scientists think is most likely how the universe, our plannet, life began. and i'm not against science, i love science and going against evolution doesn't hold science back b/c guessing how the universe began doesn't improve science at all nor does it benifit humanity except for athiests to call every theist stupid cuz they don't believe the guesses of scientists. if you want to benifit humanity, focus on the future, not on the past. this guess work is a waste of time cuz there's no way to even prove it.
good point, but lets talk about how this applies to evelution. in order for evelution to work they must prove the earth is millions of years old. how do they do this? using various dating methods. though there have been many cases that have proven them to be inaccurate. here's one example: samples were taken from a lava dome on mt st helens and radio dated them using potassium-argon in 1986. they got ages of 340,000 to 2.8 million years old on rocks only 10 years old. what's their explination? this is it "considerins that the half-life of potassium-40 is fairly long (1,250 million years) the potassium-argon method cannot be used to date samples that are much younger than 6,000 years old. a few thousand years are not enough time for argon 40 to accumulate in a sample at high enough concentrations to be dectected and quantified." what does that mean? well lets play the what if game. what if the earth was around 6,000 years old? well then this method wouldn't be accurate on any rock that exists according to their own description. well what about carbon dating? well that is used on organic substances, not rocks, and is not accurate after 50,000 years because unlike potassium 40, carbon 14 has a much lower half-life and after 50,000 years, all the carbon 14 in a substance would be gone, decayed into nitrogen. therefore, cannot possibly give the dates necessary for evolution. it's bad science.
"Your god doesn't seem complicated at all. It's an excuse for ignorance."
oh he doesn't? ok maybe you can explain how God can be 3 people but one person at the same time, how a part of him can know something the other does not cuz not even i understand that and it's my religion not your's. you don't even care therefore you never thought about it so of course he seams simple it's a possibility we can overlook cuz it's stupid.
apparently those of you don't know what science is. this is how it works, you come up with a hypothesis, then you do an experiment to prove it wrong, or possibly right. if the experiment doesn't work, it's wrong. if it does work it could be right, but you could later disprove it with another experiment so we can only go so far when proving something right. evelution, however, cannot be experimented because we don't have millions of years to observe these things and we don't exactly understand how life started in the first place. it's an incomplete theory and no one can deny that. but this theory can't even get close to be proven b/c it can't even make it past the guessing stage. therefore evolution isn't science at all, it's just a guess that some scientists think is most likely how the universe, our plannet, life began. and i'm not against science, i love science and going against evolution doesn't hold science back b/c guessing how the universe began doesn't improve science at all nor does it benifit humanity except for athiests to call every theist stupid cuz they don't believe the guesses of scientists. if you want to benifit humanity, focus on the future, not on the past. this guess work is a waste of time cuz there's no way to even prove it.
