Banning circumsicion

[The Grand Nudger]

It's unlikely that it has anything to do with opposition to the religious aspect. Dick docking has been downtrending since 1980, even among the religious. There's a really simple reason. No national medical association in the western world recommends it. It removes the most import bits..from the users perspective, that is. Thousands of coiled fine touch receptors, branches of the dorsal nerve, 10-20k specialized erotogenic nerves endings of different types. It removes the glide action that benefits both parties during intercourse. This is why the nutball I mentioned earlier thought it would make us masturbate less. It doesn't, ofc, it just makes it less fun.

To put a super funny nail in the coffin, what with all the worries about hygeine...it also removes the apparatus contained in the inner foreskin responsible... in undamaged dicks...for producing antibacterial and antiviral proteins as well as pathogen killing enzymes. Our foreskins are not and never were a liability. It's a critical part of the system and it's loss leads to diminished function.

-and I know, I know, demographics means more than a few of us here are cut - and we all think "nah, my shit works just fine, thanks" - but ofc we would think that - what with having it chopped off at birth and with no frame of reference outside of that. It's not barbaric because of one act of nonconsensual cruelty. It's barbaric because it irreparably damages a person for their entire life. It's the male clitoris equivalent - practically and developmentally.