(October 2, 2023 at 4:06 pm)GrandizerII Wrote:(October 2, 2023 at 3:33 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: I never said Carrier was "economically obigated".
That's ALL you got ?
I want to know who else is in your "consensus" claim.
YOU claimed consensus. You don't know what that consists of ?
That's all I got? Are you not reading my posts properly?
I claimed consensus, yes. Do YOU know what that consists of? Hint: It's not only going to involve a handful of scholars that may be to your liking. Again, you're rigging the game so that no matter what I say, you will not be satisfied.
Also, why don't you present your positive case for the mythicist Paul? Bring it to the table, so we can analyze it.
You claimed consensus.
I'm simply asking who that consists of, and who in it consists of those not economically obligated.
It's YOUR claim. Sopport it or STFU.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist