Roe v. Wade is gone.

[Rev. Rye]

No one gives a damn what some armchair thinkers say.

There are neuroscientists that reject physicalism

And are they in the minority? If not, is the non-physicalist position growing among neuroscientists? There's always going to be fringe people in any scientific discipline trying to push positions that the majority have long debunked.

So this point is moot. It's even more moot by the simple fact the Fetus regardless of ontological status has no right to the woman's body 

If you believe in "My body, my choice", you also should be against forced covid vaccination.

That's a false equivalence for a number of reasons, and perhaps the most cogent of them (besides the fact that refusing to take the vaccine has far more far-reaching consequences than refusing to bear a child) is that, well, the choice to abort is far more likely to be well-informed. Whenever the efficacy of the COVID vaccine has been studied, it's been shown to be both effective against COVID (and even when one gets COVID after getting vaccinated, the sickness is shorter and less severe) and safe.

Also, Abortion isn't murder as in numerous places it is not unlawful nor is it unjustified. 

So genocide is ok if government supports it?

[/quote]
Or that murder is a defined term. Specifically, every dictionary definition I've seen of "Murder" specifies that it's the unlawful killing of a human being. If it's lawful, it's not murder. Homicide, perhaps, but if the law says it's not illegal, it's definitionally not murder.