Your Ideal Relationship Arrangement

[Bucky Ball]

Did I say harm anywhere ?
I prefer the non - cheap versions of shit in life.

If you aren't implying harm, then I don't understand you argument.

We agree, I take it, that such an encounter would be pleasurable.

So it seems to me that I am saying that having a partner (with all that rich non-shit sex) + also having pleasurable cheap shit sex is better than only having a partner, yet you seem to disagree but have no case to undermine my hedonic calculus here.  Rich + cheap is still better than just rich, if there's zero harm/downside yes?

So, you must be implying that there's some harm in casual sexual encounters for your disapproval to make sense.  Can you explain what that harm is?

Wrong again. A meaningful encounter is far more satisfying than your cheap meaningless ones.