The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions

[Belacqua]

Can you give any specific examples of this "fairly hostile attitude" dissuading anyone from his research?

You do realize that hostility may be shown in many different ways -- such as rejecting scientific findings because they conflict with church doctrine. Tell us now that that newer happened. There's also the punishment of Galileo as I mentioned earlier. That religious men made scientific discoveries is only natural. The real question is how did the church take to discoveries that contradicted its myth. There's also Bruno:

Ideas could get you burned alive in 16th century Europe. Such was the fate of the Renaissance philosopher, Giordano Bruno. After a heresy trial that lasted eight years, the Roman Inquisition convicted him and burned him at the stake in the middle of the square of Campo de’ Fiori, in Rome in the year 1600. He had no last words because a metal clamp had been fastened to his tongue. He was carried to his killing on a mule; a tradition that probably evolved because many of the condemned could no longer walk after prolonged periods of torture prior to their execution.

After being publicly stripped naked, Bruno was tied up at the center of the cobblestone plaza. The authorities opted to carry out his sentence at dawn – the square, which is today Rome’s marketplace, located just a few blocks from where Julius Caesar was murdered, was not yet teeming with its daily hustle and bustle. Moments before the pyre was set ablaze, a cross was thrust in front of Bruno’s face. He turned his head away from it in defiance, his death imminent. And as the chants of a religious congregation echoed across the execution grounds, the obstinate heretic was devoured by the inferno.

https://historyhub.info/the-forces-behin...ano-bruno/

If science conflicted with their dogma, which was given primacy, do you think?

If it's true that hostility can be shown in many different ways, you should be able to point to many examples. Instead, you point to Galileo and Bruno.

Neither man was punished for doing science. I know that it's popular these days to believe so, but it's a myth. The truth is available in many serious history books, though rarely on TV.

This is from Frances Yates' book on Bruno:

Ever since Domenico Berti2 revived him as the hero who died rather than
renounce his scientific conviction of the truth of the Copernican theory, the
martyr for modern science, the philosopher who broke with medieval
Aristotelianism and ushered in the modern world, Bruno has been in a false
position. The popular view of Bruno is still roughly as just stated. If I have not
finally proved its falsity, I have written this book in vain.

For what is the truth? Bruno was an out-and-out magician, an “Egyptian” and
Hermetist of the deepest dye, for whom the Copernican heliocentricity heralded
the return of magical religion, who in his dispute with the Oxford doctors
associated Copernicanism with the magic of Ficino's De vita coelitus
comparanda, for whom the Copernican diagram was a hieroglyph of the divine,
who defended earth-movement with Hermetic arguments concerning the magical
life in all nature, whose aim was to achieve Hermetic gnosis, to reflect the world
in the mens by magical means, including the stamping of magic images of the
stars on memory, and so to become a great Magus and miracle-working religious
leader. Sweeping away the theological superstructure which the Christian
Hermetists had evolved, using Cabala only as subsidiary to Magia, Bruno is a
pure naturalist whose religion is the natural religion of the pseudo-Egyptian
Hermetic Asclepius. Bruno's world view shows what could be evolved out of an
extension and intensification of the Hermetic impulse towards the world.

Through a Hermetic interpretation of Copernicus and Lucretius, Bruno arrives at
his astonishing vision of an infinite extension of the divine as reflected in nature.
The earth moves because it is alive around a sun of Egyptian magic; the planets
as living stars perform their courses with her; innumerable other worlds, moving
and alive like great animals, people an infinite universe.

Bruno was an early adopter of other people's scientific discoveries, but always said that he was the only one who really understood them, because he was able to plug them into his magical system, derived mostly from forged Egyptian tablets. He had a long and successful career traveling around Europe, and he would have lived to old age if he had not returned to Italy announcing loudly that he had come to overthrow the Catholic Church and replace it with his own system, derived from mysticism and fantasy. He was punished for heresy, not science.

As for Galileo, he was doing fine until he wrote a book that effectively called the Pope a dummy. At that point his many supporters in the Vatican could do nothing for him. He was punished for heresy, not science. His teacher had been a Benedictine, his greatest backers were in the Vatican, his system had not yet been confirmed by empirical evidence, and he went out of his way to offend people. 

https://www.amazon.com/Galileo-Rome-Rise...355&sr=8-1

[/url]
https://www.amazon.com/Giordano-Bruno-Hermetic-Tradition-Frances/dp/0226950077/ref=sr_1_2?crid=1MFFWQFLA8JSK&keywords=Giordano+Bruno&qid=1700511335&sprefix=giordano+brun%2Caps%2C376&sr=8-2

[url=https://www.amazon.com/Giordano-Bruno-Philosopher-Ingrid-Rowland/dp/0226730247/ref=sr_1_4?crid=1MFFWQFLA8JSK&keywords=Giordano+Bruno&qid=1700511335&sprefix=giordano+brun%2Caps%2C376&sr=8-4]https://www.amazon.com/Giordano-Bruno-Philosopher-Ingrid-Rowland/dp/0226730247/ref=sr_1_4?crid=1MFFWQFLA8JSK&keywords=Giordano+Bruno&qid=1700511335&sprefix=giordano+brun%2Caps%2C376&sr=8-4

Or you can go to the Wikipedia pages and scroll down to the bibliography and further reading. It's best to read books by historians, and ignore the myths spread on TV by science popularizers.