Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 13, 2024, 12:18 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
#51
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
(November 19, 2023 at 10:00 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Well shit Tim, you appear to know so little about the subject that I wonder whether you ought to be reading or writing?

All I asked was for you to give examples of this “shitting on discovery”. It’s weird that you keep avoiding this simple and reasonable request. I can’t discuss this until I know precisely what you’re talking about.

Quote:You cant expect anyone to take you seriously if you want to litigate such basic facts of mere reality.

“Litigate”? No. But you do need to explain what these “facts” you’re referring to are.



Quote:Where you don't pretend to draw an absolute blank at the notion of the church as a gatekeeping force in western history, because you're doing real history.

They were pretty active in gatekeeping theological orthodoxy. But not “discoveries”. Which is why you’re working so hard to wriggle away from my quite reasonable request for any examples of the latter.


Quote:Say you spent an hour explaining to silly atheists that the church didn't burn people for one absurd reason, but for another absurd reason, what do you think you will have accomplished.

Accuracy. It’s a key element in rational and objective historical analysis.
Tim O'Neill

History for Atheists - New Atheists Getting History Wrong
Reply
#52
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
(November 19, 2023 at 11:02 pm)TimOneill Wrote:
(November 19, 2023 at 10:41 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: It should be noted that kings and princes used divine right to justify their rule over peasants. It just so happens that those same kings and princes had sway in who could and could not be educated beyond, say, knowing when to plant crops.

They did? Can you point me to examples of evidence these kings limited who could be educated?

Sure. There's that whole money thing, because even then education costed money, which rather limited the opportunities for a peasant whose pay was, say, a peck of peppers. More to the point, universities were funded by either the royalty or the Church itself.

Here, check this out:

Quote:During the Middle Ages in Europe, education for children was largely influenced by social status, the dominant role of the Church, gender disparities, and the disruptive impact that the constant threat of war and invasion posed.

Education was primarily accessible to the privileged elite, such as nobility and wealthy landowners. The majority of the European population, who were overwhelmingly peasants and serfs, had limited access to formal education.

The Catholic Church played a significant role in education during this period. Most schools were "ecclesiastical," meaning they were related to the Catholic Church.

Monastic and cathedral schools were established by the Church to train future clergy and monks. Education centered around religious studies, reading and writing Latin, and studying scripture. The Church viewed education as a means to maintain its authority and perpetuate its teachings.

[...]

Apart from religious instruction, students might receive basic training in arithmetic, writing, and grammar. Arithmetic was primarily taught for practical purposes such as basic calculations related to trade and commerce. Writing skills were important for correspondence, record-keeping, and producing religious texts. Grammar instruction focused on the proper use of Latin, as it was the language of scholarly discourse.

There were no public schools and literacy rates among peasants was very low. Those who had the privilege of getting an education usually either learned at home with a tutor if they were not sent to an ecclesiastical school.

Read more: https://www.studentsofhistory.com/educat...iddle-ages

There's also the fact that because education was expensive, and peasants weren't generally wealthy because their products were expropriated in large part by their lieges, they lacked the resources to, say, attend the Sorbonne or Oxford. It just so happened that those lieges appealed to divine right to -- wait for it -- keep those peasants poor and uneducated.

(November 19, 2023 at 11:02 pm)TimOneill Wrote:
Quote:Put shortly, who decided who needed education or not? Kings and princes supported by religious authorities, in a large part.

See above.

Right -- read above.

(November 19, 2023 at 11:02 pm)TimOneill Wrote:
Quote: It should also be noted that the Church had a fairly hostile attitude to scientific learning in general, meaning to me that even it isn't directly culpable in misunderstanding geosphericity or heliocentricity, it's still guilty in part of retarding learning.

Again, can you give us evidence of this “hostility”?

Oh, I don't know, hauling Galileo to a court in the Vatican and threaten him with Inquisitory punishment unless he renounced heliocentricty? There's that whole Copernicus holding off on publishing until after death to avoid the same issue? We could also look at how long it took the Church to acknowledge that Darwin was right?

If you need more, I'll be happy to oblige. The evidence is there for you to examine.


(November 19, 2023 at 11:02 pm)TimOneill Wrote:
Quote:That comes with punishing scientists for learning.

Can you give any examples of scientists “punished for learning”?

Read about Galileo.

Reply
#53
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
There is no question disparity in education protects privilege, encourages abuse, and kills social mobility.     So it is hard to argue those who sought to restrict education didn;t have what we might consider malice or self service, conscious or subconscious, as at least part of their motivation.

However,  that does not mean in the absent of such malice,  the medieval society would in general have seen benefit from wider education, and seen it quickly enough so it would seem broadening education is a sound policy worth the cost.     I suspect broadening of education would bring different amount of benefit in the Middle Ages depending on the society.      For primarily agrarian peasant society, high levels of literacy probably would bring little easily discernible benefit, and in the short term probably impoverish the society by removing parts of labor force from production to educate them at a time when child labor was critical to overall agrarian productivity.     On the other head, for society which dependent heavily on being the middleman in maritime commerce, high level of literacy would probably bring more easily discernible benefit.

It’s probably not a coincidence that the only European societies to achieve significant overall levels of literacy outside aristocracy and clergy before the Industrial Revolution were those of the Italian maritime republics, followed by England and Holland.   All of these depended very heavily on maritime commerce.    All other European societies depended more on agrarian peasantry for production and wealth.     None of the other European societies began to attain significant literacy rates outside aristocracy and clergy until after the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in their respective societies.

Come to think of it, which pre-industrial, primarily agrarian peasant society around the world ever attained significant literacy rates outside aristocracy, clergy and a small segment of scholar/tradesmen/administrators?
Reply
#54
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
(November 19, 2023 at 11:12 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I guess you're unfamiliar with anti literacy laws as well.

I am. What “anti literacy laws”?

Quote: it’s a good thing you came here, in case you ever wanted to write another book about history for us.

I’ve never written any books, so I have no idea what that means either.
Tim O'Neill

History for Atheists - New Atheists Getting History Wrong
Reply
#55
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
(November 19, 2023 at 11:09 pm)Belacqua Wrote:
(November 19, 2023 at 10:41 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: It should also be noted that the Church had a fairly hostile attitude to scientific learning in general, meaning to me that even it isn't directly culpable in misunderstanding geosphericity or heliocentricity, it's still guilty in part of retarding learning. That comes with punishing scientists for learning.

Here is a list of one or two brave souls who managed to escape this horrible oppression:




This list is only A through N. The complete list is too long to post. 

The full list may be seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ca...scientists

Please note that this list is only of scientists and mathematicians who were also Catholic clergymen. Non-clergy Catholics are in a separate list.

Right, I wasn't saying the Church was entirely hostile. The astute reader will have noted that I was pointing out that medieval rulers were quite happy to use religious justification to secure their earthly positions. An even-smarter fella might have noticed that this Church didn't bother to object -- unless said regent interfered with that Church's own Earthly concerns.

Reply
#56
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
You misinterpret my unwillingness to entertain your nonsense with wriggling away from something Tim. The church has a long and well documented history of shitting on discovery - but don't take my word for it, take theirs...they keep apologizing for precisely that....and other things.

You know this, ofc, having consulted learned scholars and experts.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#57
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
(November 19, 2023 at 11:27 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Right, I wasn't saying the Church was entirely hostile. The astute reader will have noted that I was pointing out that medieval rulers were quite happy to use religious justification to secure their earthly positions. An even-smarter fella might have noticed that this Church didn't bother to object -- unless said regent interfered with that Church's own Earthly concerns.

OK, "fairly hostile attitude" isn't the same as "entirely hostile." 

We can agree that, given the evidence, the church's attitude to science didn't prevent hundreds and hundreds of clergymen and lay Catholics from making significant contributions to science and mathematics. In many cases, the educational institutions where these people worked were sponsored and paid for by the church, and the teachers were clergy.

Can you give any specific examples of this "fairly hostile attitude" dissuading anyone from his research?
Reply
#58
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
(November 19, 2023 at 11:37 pm)Belacqua Wrote: Can you give any specific examples of this "fairly hostile attitude" dissuading anyone from his research?

You do realize that hostility may be shown in many different ways -- such as rejecting scientific findings because they conflict with church doctrine. Tell us now that that newer happened. There's also the punishment of Galileo as I mentioned earlier. That religious men made scientific discoveries is only natural. The real question is how did the church take to discoveries that contradicted its myth. There's also Bruno:

Quote:Ideas could get you burned alive in 16th century Europe. Such was the fate of the Renaissance philosopher, Giordano Bruno. After a heresy trial that lasted eight years, the Roman Inquisition convicted him and burned him at the stake in the middle of the square of Campo de’ Fiori, in Rome in the year 1600. He had no last words because a metal clamp had been fastened to his tongue. He was carried to his killing on a mule; a tradition that probably evolved because many of the condemned could no longer walk after prolonged periods of torture prior to their execution.

After being publicly stripped naked, Bruno was tied up at the center of the cobblestone plaza. The authorities opted to carry out his sentence at dawn – the square, which is today Rome’s marketplace, located just a few blocks from where Julius Caesar was murdered, was not yet teeming with its daily hustle and bustle. Moments before the pyre was set ablaze, a cross was thrust in front of Bruno’s face. He turned his head away from it in defiance, his death imminent. And as the chants of a religious congregation echoed across the execution grounds, the obstinate heretic was devoured by the inferno.

https://historyhub.info/the-forces-behin...ano-bruno/

If science conflicted with their dogma, which was given primacy, do you think?

Reply
#59
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
One of their head shamans said it best. Any conflict between science and the god of cathol is not real, it is based on false assumptions.

Not their false catholic assumptions, ofc. Fucking catholics, they won't shut their mouth when helpful idiots are trying to make excuses for them and rewrite their history. These convos are always so tedious, always the same basic form. They didn't do it, and if they did do it it wasn't bad, and if it was bad it was someone else's fault, and if it was no one else's fault everyone does it.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#60
RE: The Current Evolution of Ancient Religious Institutions
(November 19, 2023 at 11:21 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: For primarily agrarian peasant society, high levels of literacy probably would bring little easily discernible benefit, and in the short term probably impoverish the society by removing parts of labor force from production to educate them at a time when child labor was critical to overall agrarian productivity.     On the other head, for society which dependent heavily on being the middleman in maritime commerce, high level of literacy would probably bring more easily discernible benefit.

In a primarily agrarian society one need look no further than agriculture for the cost of illiteracy and a lack of general education.  Then, or now, frankly.

There may be nearly a million minors working as field labor in the us alone to this very day.  We've observed 12 year olds in the fields, which, as it so happens, is when we suspect that field labor started back in the day.  As a consequence of demographic growth there are likely more children doing field labor today or at least within living memory than there were in most small nations in the 17th century.  Farm operations with high levels of minor labor are not particularly well known for their productivity.  Even less well known for productivity are farms operated by illiterates and/or people with no education whatsoever.  There are numerous federal and state prgrams aimed at this because it's seen as a driver of rural poverty as well as a loss of productive capacity and economic activity.  

If we, today, were to revert to a previous state -even more minors, even less education- say a pre 1950 state of us agriculture, then the loss would not just be economic or counted in bushels of corn per acre...it would be in human lives.  As we see, all throughout the history of agrarian societies, they struggled with this issue.  It's always been resolvable, but not by children who couldn't read, adults who saw no value in education, or people who were de facto or de jure prevented from educating themselves.  That's the very mountain we climbed over to realize better yields and better methodologies. To then communicate these methods and this knowledge from coast to coast. Not that we don't backslide. We've created another farm crisis in the here and now by telling all the smart farm kids to get off the farm for the last generation or two. That's how farms ended up being run by goobers who lost their shirts to agribusiness giants (while simultaneously destroying their land)..agribusiness giants who are very much interested in a well educated workforce and they seem to be doing extremely well on account of it.

In agronomic circles you'll often hear the medieval period referred to as the second green revolution (the assumption of ag being the first, the 1930's-50's being the third - and the fourth being some as yet undefined but always just on the horizon thing).  They were agricultural innovators.  Even in their own time they realized benefits through a more educated and technical agrarian workforce.  Without that there never could have been anything like the feudal system... and... arguably, with an even more educated and technical workforce it wouldn't have worked either.  In sum, imo, it is not and has never been that there would be a negligible benefit of education to agrarian societies, but that there would have been a negligible benefit or even a positive detriment to the authoritarian regimes those agrarian laborers worked the fields under.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Secret hiding place for ancient christians Foxaèr 20 2416 May 11, 2018 at 7:57 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  My current religious teacher isn't as good as I thought Der/die AtheistIn 10 2019 November 16, 2017 at 3:24 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
  The bible and ancient history. Lemonvariable72 66 12652 December 3, 2014 at 3:43 pm
Last Post: RobbyPants
  Why Ancient Aliens is far more plausible than Christianity FreeTony 30 4853 July 27, 2014 at 11:54 am
Last Post: Dystopia
  Ancient Confession Found: 'We Invented Jesus Christ' Gooders1002 82 27140 April 23, 2014 at 11:40 pm
Last Post: Mark Fulton
Tongue Apologetics was much more efficient in ancient times Tea Earl Grey Hot 19 8695 September 14, 2012 at 12:26 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  The Great Virgin Mother Isis - Ancient Mythology is not a Cheeseburger michaelsherlock 13 7817 June 12, 2012 at 8:29 am
Last Post: michaelsherlock



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)