Theology and Sociology

[Gawdzilla Sama]

To sum up my thoughts on this last part, I think using reason to evaluate claims is the right way to decide whether it is true or not. I think that including all those claims in the realm of the imaginary just because there is a component that isn’t evaluable at first is to throw out the baby with the bath water.

We don't have the tools to evaluate a god. We only have the claims of other humans. So we are in the null set. {∅}

It's rather like judging a book by its cover because we are unable to open it.