How about some witchcraft? 
If you take a circle and inscribe a triangle, you have what I see to be the symbol of the universe. It is useful symbolism in many ways; in this case, what is inside the triangle can be seen to be real, the areas between the triangle and circle imaginary. Now if we take the number of the universe - 5.13 x 10^61 - and inscribe a polygon of that many sides, it becomes clear that the spaces for the miraculous reduce to the near infinitesimal.
About the time science comes up with an hypothesis to eliminate "god of the gaps" altogether. I have such an hypothesis; it is only a matter of time that mine or another's makes it to the scientific community. I willingly hold to the fringe; to be called crank or crackpot, to fear no dishonor in being wrong because I trust in evolution and emergence and my place within. It is tao.
If I am correct, the will to do the miraculous is ours; if I am incorrect, the miraculous is seen to be delusion. That's win/win.

If you take a circle and inscribe a triangle, you have what I see to be the symbol of the universe. It is useful symbolism in many ways; in this case, what is inside the triangle can be seen to be real, the areas between the triangle and circle imaginary. Now if we take the number of the universe - 5.13 x 10^61 - and inscribe a polygon of that many sides, it becomes clear that the spaces for the miraculous reduce to the near infinitesimal.
About the time science comes up with an hypothesis to eliminate "god of the gaps" altogether. I have such an hypothesis; it is only a matter of time that mine or another's makes it to the scientific community. I willingly hold to the fringe; to be called crank or crackpot, to fear no dishonor in being wrong because I trust in evolution and emergence and my place within. It is tao.
If I am correct, the will to do the miraculous is ours; if I am incorrect, the miraculous is seen to be delusion. That's win/win.
