The Kalam Cosmological Argument

[Pat Mustard]

@Pat Mustard
You're insisting that a god must be able to do a thing you've deemed impossible for it to be called omnipotent..but, again, plantingas omnipotence does not make such a demand or claim.

Plantinga doesn't get to redefine omnipotence. Otherwise we could declare "inability to carry out any physical or mental action" as omnipotence and start worshipping a random rock.

That's the problem with all these christian arguments, they take terms with quite specific meanings and twist those meanings into something else rather than facing up to the fact that their god cannot posees the suite of attributes ascribed to it under any circumstances.