RE: The Absurd GOP
November 21, 2024 at 6:39 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2024 at 6:42 pm by TheWhiteMarten.)
(November 21, 2024 at 6:13 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(November 21, 2024 at 6:07 pm)TheWhiteMarten Wrote: "Either you're mighty forgetful, or dishonest. Which is it?"
You make a claim, and then, once called on it, deny actually making said claim. What is the possible third option? Iranian superhackers Managed to tamper with your post without even registering a “this post was last modified by”?
First Stage - Non Sequitur
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement A: "Allowing men - transexual or not - into women's bathrooms poses an inherent risk to women."
Response: "You allege that any sort of man, trans or no, is dangerous."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We begin with a non sequitur that sets the ground work for the later FD; the belief that encouraging men to insert themselves into women's spaces that revolve around privacy and isolation will increase the risk to women does not equal a belief that all men therefor are dangerous.
I allege that a certain type of man is dangerous in this situation - deviants, perverts, sexual assaulters - and that giving them legal protection to insert themselves into areas where women are at a high risk is not sound policy.
Second Stage - Call out on Non Sequitur, response with False Dilemma
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement B: "I've not made this claim [i]('any sort of man... is dangerous.'), which is something of a common trend. Allowing men - transexual or not - into women's bathrooms poses an inherent risk to women."[/i]
Response: "Either you're mighty forgetful, or dishonest. Which is it?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. The simple reality is that there could exist possibilities other than forgetfulness or dishonesty, such as...
B. ...the possibility that I am neither forgetful nor dishonest, but rather the respondent has created a non sequitur argument and then doubled down upon it.
As both A. and B. are true it is by definition of a false dilemma; the true choice was never presented to me.