(December 13, 2024 at 11:20 am)Angrboda Wrote: Bel may not be the most diplomatic in his approach, but I think he has a point in saying that we need to engage the actual arguments and conceptions of theologians. It's easy to start from what we imagine has to be the case, only to find that when we get to the end, some clever Christer has already anticipated our objection.
In the end, their arguments amount for something that just doesn't exist. They need to learn to first prove its existence before expecting to begin the debate with their misconceived notion that a god already exists.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
~ Erin Hunter