'i believe the literal creation story in the bible. there is no evidence to support a kind of animal changing to a different kind of animal. example: apes to humans, horses to giraffes.'
Do you see the irony? You believe literal biblical creation, which bears no evidence.
We have >98% similarity in DNA to Chimpanzees. Giraffes do not share common ancestor with horses, try deer.
Given the DNA similarities between these species, it is proof that we are related. You clearly do not understand evolution. If you have a Kindle, The Origin of The Species is available for free.
Where is there any reason to believe in the literal translation of the bible? Please do show any evidence you have for this.
Do you see the irony? You believe literal biblical creation, which bears no evidence.
We have >98% similarity in DNA to Chimpanzees. Giraffes do not share common ancestor with horses, try deer.
Given the DNA similarities between these species, it is proof that we are related. You clearly do not understand evolution. If you have a Kindle, The Origin of The Species is available for free.
Where is there any reason to believe in the literal translation of the bible? Please do show any evidence you have for this.
