(January 1, 2012 at 6:42 am)chipan Wrote:Ace Otana Wrote:Prove it.
well every time we find something organized we can infer that someone organized it example: stonehenge. they're just random big rocks that don't make anything complicated other than a circle, but we assume they were placed there by someone as we know of no natural process that can do that. how does applying the same to more complicated things make it different?
We know who built it, we know why. We understand it so deeply we can tell you in detail. What you're trying to do is compare man made structures to the universe. You cannot compare the two. We know that things can form on their own. With the help of gravity, matter is pulled together. Which is how this planet formed. 12 possibles of matter, 4 forces of nature and 13.7 billion years of interaction, and you don't think it's possible for planets, solar systems and galaxies to form on their own? You sir, lack a lot of knowledge. You are arguing from ignorance. You don't know any better.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
