'well every time we find something organized we can infer that someone organized it'
This is the watchmaker analogy.
This is the problem with that analogy;
'here are three main arguments against the Watchmaker analogy. The first is that complex artifacts do not, in fact, require a designer, but can and do arise from "mindless" natural processes (as in the "Infinite Monkey Theorem"). The second argument is that the watch is a faulty analogy. The third argument is that the watchmaker is arguably a far more complex organism than the watch, and if complexity proves intelligent design, then the question arises: who designed such a complex designer?'(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_...#Criticism)
This is the watchmaker analogy.
This is the problem with that analogy;
'here are three main arguments against the Watchmaker analogy. The first is that complex artifacts do not, in fact, require a designer, but can and do arise from "mindless" natural processes (as in the "Infinite Monkey Theorem"). The second argument is that the watch is a faulty analogy. The third argument is that the watchmaker is arguably a far more complex organism than the watch, and if complexity proves intelligent design, then the question arises: who designed such a complex designer?'(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_...#Criticism)
