Quote:that explination does not appear in your source that i see. and first, these stones are much more massive than those used for the pyramids. second, egypt had a lot more manpower. third, i have a source i already stated that says we don't exactly know how they moved those 25 ton rocks.I never mentioned 'know' pal. However it is highly probable. It was on the discovery channel. A rather interesting program. Doesn't matter how they built it, the fact is, they did.
Quote:it doesn't have to be the default answer, however if it's impossible that these things came to be on their own, then that leaves a designer. it's the only other option.No it doesn't. Actually if that were true we'd be taking 2 steps back in knowledge, not forward. God is still not an answer because he/it/thing hasn't been demonstrated to exist yet. A does not prove B without first proving A.
Besides, you haven't demonstrated that it is impossible. You've only given your opinion, nothing else.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
