Theists: Why do you love God?

[chi pan]

I want you to do this on your own and tell me how evolution differs from your idiotic idea (apart from the fact that one is proven to have happened, and the other one is a story in a shit little book).

the difference is a lot and i mean A LOT more change in a longer period of time. the difference is all those animals can interbreed. dogs developing to different, more diverse dogs is actually supported by the theory of evolution.

If polar bears developed afterwards (by the way, fossil and DNA records age the polar bear at around 130,000 to 150,000 years old), how did they get there?

i don't consider the dating methods accurate. i've seen textbooks that say "the fossils date the rocks" and that say "the rocks date the fossils." one even said "the rocks date the fossils but the fossils date the rocks more accurately." i've seen a rational explination from those who dated new rocks and got dates of millions of years in the dating. their explination was "due to the the fact that the halflife of potassium 40 is fairly long, it cannot accurately date rocks that are younger than 6000 years old because that is not enough time for patissium 40 to accumulate" what does that mean for your theories?

Again, I want you to answer the question yourself. You strike me as someone who never checks, thinks about or examines evidence as long as it supports something you already believe. Because the answer to this question can be found by searching on Google for 'giant clams mount everest' extremely easily.

ya b/c i didn't do any research. i didn't provide any sources and put them up. sure....