RE: Theists: Why do you love God?
January 2, 2012 at 12:21 pm
(This post was last modified: January 2, 2012 at 12:28 pm by ElDinero.)
(January 2, 2012 at 12:09 pm)chipan Wrote: i don't consider the dating methods accurate. i've seen textbooks that say "the fossils date the rocks" and that say "the rocks date the fossils." one even said "the rocks date the fossils but the fossils date the rocks more accurately." i've seen a rational explination from those who dated new rocks and got dates of millions of years in the dating. their explination was "due to the the fact that the halflife of potassium 40 is fairly long, it cannot accurately date rocks that are younger than 6000 years old because that is not enough time for patissium 40 to accumulate" what does that mean for your theories?
That you don't understand them, or refuse to acknowledge them because they are inconvenient for you. And that you don't understand where one method of dating ends and another begins. Hidden in there is a half truth somewhere, because potassium-argon dating is best used on older rocks (older than you even think the world is, because you're a numbskull), but what that has to do with DNA and fossil evidence I have no idea. Your distrust of the methods flies in the face of decades of scientific research by the greatest names in those fields, and the evidence is readily available and their results can be recreated. It is perfectly obvious now that you are suffering from cognitive dissonance (look it up). You're ignoring the evidence because you've already made up your mind and if something contradicts what you already believe, you claim it to be unreliable.
By the way, you have to be a special kind of stupid to spell the same word two completely different ways in the same sentence. 'Patissium'? How do you even tie your fucking shoelaces?
I noticed you dodged all my questions about your 6000 year old polar bears, by the way. Doing a smashing job of proving that you ignore things you don't have answers for or that force you to do even the slightest bit of thinking. You are without a doubt the stupidest person who has ever posted on these forums, and I think it's important that you realise it.
Quote:ya b/c i didn't do any research. i didn't provide any sources and put them up. sure....
Then how do you not know the answer to your question? The answer to it is so easy to find, and I've told you how to find it. So again: You tell me. How did clam shells get into tall mountains?
