(January 2, 2012 at 6:10 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(January 2, 2012 at 6:00 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Okay, so I go to that link Chipan, and I see page after page of people handing your ass back at you while you jump around like a squirel trying to enact damage control.
Im not impressed in the slightest. Your list of contemporaries have been brought up so many times on the forum by all the fundies before you..
Guess what, we know what you are going to do before you do it, and we already know how to throw it back down your throat, make you gag on it, then joke the fuck out of you while you choke.
Like I said before...your evidence should be fucking BRILLIANT. Otherwise dont even bother.
Seriously - when was the last time any of us can recall hearing an original argument? One that hasn't been thoroughly debunked and/or argued to death already?
Day after day, month after month, year after year, on this and other similar sites, theists bring some argument that's new to them and they come in here thinking "CHECKMATE, atheists" only to find out that we've heard it a thousand times before.
Thats exactly it. There is very little a theist can do to suprise me now. I have honestly heard every single argument they have right now, most especially the Christians.
The thing is, it gets so booring knowing the answers to the shit they present that you actually WISH for them to have a new and better argument.
Sure...its new to Chipan, but I read the debunking about his "contemporary historians" list 10 years ago. And that list of his had been debunked like well over a hundred years before I was even born.
It is still chipans fault. He did shoddy homework. He didnt look into the history if the argument he presented and was unaware that some on his list were ratted out of forgeries even as late as the 16th century.
So yes, i feel justified in still blaming Chipan for his fuck up. If he didnt want to fuck up, then he should take his work more seriously. Otherwise he deserves to be mocked the fuck up as an idiot.
