RE: The Attack on Scientific Truth in Public Schools
January 2, 2012 at 8:30 pm
(This post was last modified: January 2, 2012 at 8:56 pm by Perhaps.)
Perhaps I can simplify my opinion...
Children should be taught the scientific method and use said method to verify or falsify scientific theories. Allowing creationism in the class room does not mean it is taught as fact. It means that children are able to observe opposing views and scientifically choose the one with the most evidential support.
But like I said, we can agree to disagree. I won't attack you for doing so, however. Like I said, I advocate tolerance and non-biased education.
As a side note: my sister attends school in America and I never said she is two grade levels higher because of supernaturalism. I said that she most certainly was not hindered by being exposed to it.
Children should be taught the scientific method and use said method to verify or falsify scientific theories. Allowing creationism in the class room does not mean it is taught as fact. It means that children are able to observe opposing views and scientifically choose the one with the most evidential support.
But like I said, we can agree to disagree. I won't attack you for doing so, however. Like I said, I advocate tolerance and non-biased education.
As a side note: my sister attends school in America and I never said she is two grade levels higher because of supernaturalism. I said that she most certainly was not hindered by being exposed to it.
Brevity is the soul of wit.