(May 7, 2025 at 7:01 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:This is likely what @Thumpalumpacusmeant, when he said he had a good bullshit detector. A good psychologist wouldn't make sweeping made up claims like this, they'd have qualified it. Oh and it would take seconds for anyone to fact check that claim and find a credible source exposing it, for the risible hubris it is.(May 7, 2025 at 6:49 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I don't have a degree in psychology....
If you don't exemplify the Dunning-Kruger Effect, I don't know who does.
Right; because most people with a psychology degree know the dunning-kruger effect doesn't exist.
"While the Dunning-Kruger effect remains a popular concept, the debate about its true nature continues within psychology. Some researchers believe it reflects a real cognitive bias related to metacognition and self-awareness, while others view it as a statistical artefact shaped by the way data is analysed, according to Psychology Today."
A good psychologist would be able to keep an open mind, you, like may religious apologists who feel the necessity to peddle their wares among atheists, are obviously closed minded in your posts, now maybe this is just the biased blind spot you have created, to ringfence your subjective religious beliefs from critical scrutiny, while pretending you are open mindedly addressing criticisms of it, but who knows. Ultimately it doesn't matter, there are plenty of Nobel Laureates who hold subjective religious beliefs, that they can't objectively evidence.
