In your opinion what causes christians to believe in Jesus

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I get that most of you here don't have a science background. Here's a brief explanation, what people call evidence is structurally identical to affirming the consequent.

Take the following argument or hypothesis: "If it rained, the grass would be wet."

Now, if you go make an observation and the grass is wet, and you take this to be evidence that it rained, then congratulations you just got yourself kicked out of science.

That’s not really how it works. You observe it raining, and then gather evidence by looking at the grass. If you haven’t observed the rain (or gotten EVIDENCE of a recent rainfall), you can reasonably conclude that something other than rain made the grass wet. What your scenario does is test the hypothesis that rain is the only thing that makes grass wet.

You got it arse upwards. 

Boru

Edit: For the record, I have a science background - I once dated a biologist for almost a year.