(May 10, 2025 at 6:09 am)Fake Messiah Wrote:Pretty much yes, and the irony we're being too confrontational to John, after he has sought out an atheist debate forum, with no intention of subjecting his beliefs to critical scrutiny in any open or honest way, is of course comedy gold.(May 10, 2025 at 5:16 am)Belacqua Wrote: These tend to shut down discussion.
Things that tend to shut down discussion is when you and Breezy realize that you don't have any evidence that God's exist so you enter a mode of behavior where you complain that everyone is mean and stupid because they can't realize that your non-existent evidence for god is actually evidence for god.
He has even admitted to another poster he was mostly trolling, but no, I am sure it was my fault that John never offered any of the good reasons he claimed to have for his faith, or that he then laughably implied, that because he hadn't explicitly mentioned his faith was in the existence of a deity, that this inference was an unfounded assumption. Maybe it is also my fault for disputing his risible claims about evidence and how atheism is defined, because I cited the Oxford English dictionary definitions for clarity.
