RE: In your opinion what causes christians to believe in Jesus
May 26, 2025 at 6:24 am
(This post was last modified: May 26, 2025 at 6:30 am by Sheldon.)
Another interesting question that will now remain unanswered of course, is why John accepts the scientific methodology that ages the universe, but rejects that same methodology for the age of the earth?
Though of course this can be viewed in the broader sense, of him subjectively cherry picking facts to accept (only) when they conflict with his subjective religious doctrine. When he claimed to have falsified evolution on another forum, and everyone one pointed out this was based on bias in favour of subjective religious beliefs, and not on any new scientific evidence, one question I asked, that he refused to answer, was what scientific theories or facts he denied, that in no way conflicted with his subjective religious beliefs?
Obviously it's plain the answer would not remain unanswered, if his cherry picking were not entirely based on a subjective bias in favour of his religion's doctrine. he tap dance around it for ages of course, as he did here with photons.
He not only refused to answer, but kept insisting "we would all see" when he published his evidence. Obviously he never, and dismissed the claims here initially with levity, and then with a denial, despite the username's being identical, and that poster being an undergrad studying psychology, and him endlessly claiming this made him more of an expert than anyone else on the forum.
Though of course this can be viewed in the broader sense, of him subjectively cherry picking facts to accept (only) when they conflict with his subjective religious doctrine. When he claimed to have falsified evolution on another forum, and everyone one pointed out this was based on bias in favour of subjective religious beliefs, and not on any new scientific evidence, one question I asked, that he refused to answer, was what scientific theories or facts he denied, that in no way conflicted with his subjective religious beliefs?
Obviously it's plain the answer would not remain unanswered, if his cherry picking were not entirely based on a subjective bias in favour of his religion's doctrine. he tap dance around it for ages of course, as he did here with photons.
He not only refused to answer, but kept insisting "we would all see" when he published his evidence. Obviously he never, and dismissed the claims here initially with levity, and then with a denial, despite the username's being identical, and that poster being an undergrad studying psychology, and him endlessly claiming this made him more of an expert than anyone else on the forum.
