(June 20, 2025 at 6:42 am)arewethereyet Wrote:(June 20, 2025 at 3:28 am)Charlie Boy Wrote: Oh dear, he dreaded tomboy label. I wonder—was the offense truly in the labeling, or in the retrospective interpretation of it?
After all, the term tomboy never denied biology; quite the opposite—it acknowledged a girl acting outside expected norms without claiming she wasn’t a girl. Contrast that with today’s curious fashion of insisting that certain behaviors must mean something about one’s identity, or even one’s sex.
Ironically, the very “rules” you found restrictive are now enforced with far greater zeal by ideologues who believe a preference for trucks over tiaras indicates an ontological mismatch. One might ask: is the modern view truly more liberating—or simply more dogmatic in different clothing?
Of course, I welcome your thoughts—assuming they haven’t been pre-approved by the Gender Compliance Committee.
You certainly are an unpleasant entity.
I will not judge someone who feels that they are misgendered because I have never thought those thoughts or felt those feelings.
I'm just saying that it should not be up to everyone else to decide how a person wants to present themselves, so long as they aren't hurting anyone else. And sensibilities being hurt don't count.
You spend too much time worrying about things that are not your business.
I always wonder why theists are so interested in other peoples sex lives, sounds pervy to me

The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will fly to the stars.
Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it!
Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it!