That Trans Thread

[Charlie Boy]

A curious formulation—“How can anyone be so stupid…”—which, while certainly dramatic

Maybe you are not stupid but just full of shit - is there a difference?

Like this nonsense:

Children are being transitioned without full psychological assessment, while teachers and parents are sometimes legally or professionally penalised for raising doubts or suggesting caution.

Again, those are just blatant lies, like the rest of your post.

One does admire your consistency—if not in argumentation, then at least in tone. Oscillating between crude insult and categorical denial is an unusual debating strategy, but if theatrical bravado is all one has left, one makes do, I suppose.

You claim my statement—“Children are being transitioned without full psychological assessment, and dissent is professionally penalised”—is a “blatant lie.” Let's review, briefly, the real world.

Minimal psychological assessment before transitioning : The Cass Review—commissioned by NHS England to scrutinise its Gender Identity Development Service—found that gender services “were operating without adequate clinical evidence” and that the affirmative care pathway often sidestepped comprehensive psychological evaluation, even though mental health comorbidities were prevalent

Administrator Notice
Link removed per 30/30 rule.

In plain English, liking dolls over trucks may indeed be escalated to gender transition without a sufficiently robust mental-health check.

Professionals penalised for expressing caution : Take the case of Dr Jillian Spencer, a Queensland psychiatrist suspended after voicing concerns that underlying issues like autism or anxiety were being overlooked in the rush to affirm gender identity 

Administrator Notice
see above

Clearly, this is not hypothetical—it’s happening, with real consequences for real clinicians.

Now, if the above still qualifies as “just full of shit,” then one is left wondering—do facts offend you, or merely the inconvenience they pose to your ideological certainties?

You may not agree with the evidence, but to deny it exists is a form of intellectual sloth. Or worse, intentional dishonesty disguised as moral outrage. Either way, it’s not a good look.

If you're prepared to return to the realm of reason, I welcome it. But if you intend to persist with tantrums dressed up as debate, you’ll find I remain serenely unmoved.