Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Deesse23]

#1 Your ignorance and incredulity is not a (good) argument
#2 Put down the pipe
#3 Chapters and verses please

Suppose I related to you a conclusion that I hold, but you enumerated reasons for considering it unreasonable/implausible. I could then reply to you:

#1 Your ignorance and incredulity is not a (good) argument
#2 Put down the pipe
#3 Chapters and verses please

Would you be satisifed by my reply? Is that kind of reply appropriate? 

My reply was appropriate. You are way too impressed by yourself and  the very basic logical fallacies you commit.

Reductionistic atheism is too philosophically deficient to be plausible. If merely dead particles exist: 
- How did consciouness arise? Inconceivable. 
- What was the first mover that got the ball rolling? Inconceivable. 
- What is the nature of all the so-called "forces" such as gravity - what causes them?  Inconceivable. 
- How did natural selection occur?  Inconceivable (see below).

I repeat: Your inability to imagine or understand something is not a valid argument. It just shows your ignorance.

Before you start philosophizing, you should pick up some science books for example.

Why go with in an implausible one? 

The one where a celestial being created himself and then killed himself as a loophole for rules he made up by himself.....? That one?

The reductionistic hides behind the barrier of, "We don't know the answer yet but we hope to find out eventually, until then you have no right to settle on a plausible view."

This is called intellectual honesty. Try it out!
or
Do you know....then bring your evidence to the table
oops
Your evidence is "Atheism/reductionism/materialism (whatever-ism) cant be true, therefore Yahweh".