Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Ravenshire]

Twisting my words, misrepresenting what I said, and speaking for me. Yet I'm the one putting on a show?

What I said is very simple. If you don't understand a subject (which you obviously do not), you cannot intelligently comment on that subject. Whether you believe (using evolution strictly as an example) that we evolved from apes has fucking nothing to do with understanding evolution well enough to refute it, agree with it, or base an argument (for or against) on it's tenets.

You seem to want to double down on ignorance as a base for argumentation so we're again reduced to pointing and laughing, with you as the only target.

You seem to want to double down on creating a facade instead of addressing the arguments.

And you seem to think you've made an argument that isn't self refuting due to ignorance.