Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Ravenshire]

I've said nothing about your philosophy. I've called out your ignorance of the sciences. Not that I expect you to understand the difference at this point.

I beg to differ. My philosohpy is the hermeneutic for my views on science. To reject my views on science is already a critique of my philosophy. You can't separate the two, in terms of your effort to impugn my OP.  In that post, those two disciplines are inextricably intertwined.

So, you're philosophy is based on an ignorance of science (first time I've actually addressed it). Is that better? It still doesn't change the fact that if you don't understand the science, you simply can't speak intelligibly about it. Foundations built upon sand, and all that. If you wan't to remain ignorant of the rock that will give you a good foundation, that's entirely on you.