RE: Natural Selection Seems Insufficient
August 31, 2026 at 3:19 am
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2026 at 3:20 am by Jal.)
(August 31, 2026 at 3:12 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(August 31, 2026 at 3:06 am)Jal Wrote: An actualized/ realized infinity is a stupid self-contradictory concept. That's pretty much all I need to know.That was gibberish and a nin answer, and we both know it.
For a non-Christian, stupid readings are acceptable, as he has no incentive to defend the Bible.
For me, they are not acceptable.
I take it as a "not at all"
What makes you think you can make informed statements about which you have NO education about? Does that question ring a bell wrt to the course of this thread? You remember how ravenshire asked you exactly this wrt science?
The problem with you is: you see no problem with being completely ignorant. It's a non issue to you, and that's exactly what you told ravenshire.
What makes me qualified to criticize popular views? The stupidity of those views. Even a relatively stupid person can easily find the flaws in stupid views. Let's consider another blatant example. The traditional view is:
1. God is immutable, for example immutably holy, omniscient, omnipotent, etc.
2. In Nazareth, God became man.
How can an immutable God change/mutate Himself into a man? Can any theory be more stupid? Do I really need a doctorate in theology to raise an objection here?
Even Norm Geisler admitted that the traditional view requires the human mind to embrace contradictions. Geisler's hope is that God's mind, being infinite, sees things at a higher level where those contradictions are resolved. This is completely stupidity, it's essentially a cult, to embrace blatant contradictions.


