(August 31, 2026 at 4:24 pm)Jal Wrote:(August 31, 2026 at 4:16 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: This isn’t one of those agree-to-disagree moments. You’re simply wrong.You're pretty naive to assume that one version of physics is authoritative and apodictic. I suggest you take PHL 101.
If you don’t accept the underlying nature of gravity, then you don’t accept the concept of mass. If you don’t accept the concept of mass, you’re a hopelessly stupid person.
Boru
I don’t assume either of those. All science is, by its very nature, provisional. Right now, the best explanation for the nature of gravity is the Newton-Einstein model (or, if you prefer, the Classical-Relativistic one).
For this to be superseded, a new model would have to explain what is already known and offer further explanations for what isn’t. ‘God putting his hand on matter’ doesn’t do that.
For my degree, I was required to take three full credits of philosophy. Easiest classes I ever had.
‘The difference between science and the fuzzy subjects is that science requires reasoning, the others merely scholarship.’ - Heinlein
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax


